negr1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
Structured Review

Negr1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 12 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/negr1/NEGR1+Antibody/pmc12918530-146-5-6
Average 93 stars, based on 12 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Sex-specific difference on anxiety- and depressive-like behavior in neuronal growth regulator 1-knockout mice"
Article Title: Sex-specific difference on anxiety- and depressive-like behavior in neuronal growth regulator 1-knockout mice
Journal: Biology of Sex Differences
doi: 10.1186/s13293-025-00816-2
Figure Legend Snippet: Negr1 –/– mice show sex-dependent characteristics. A. This schedule provides a schematic representation of the experimental design and indicates the behavioral test period (blue box). B. Negr1 protein expression in brain tissue, confirmed by Western blot. C. Body weight was measured over time, with values recorded on the day before each behavioral testing. D . Intestinal permeability assessed using plasma FITC–dextran levels. (E) Serum CORT levels were measured in Cohort 1 (at 8, 11, and 14 weeks of age). (F) Serum CORT levels were measured in Cohort 3 (at 32 weeks, endpoint). (G) Bdnf mRNA expression in the brain was measured in Cohort 2 (at 8 and 18 weeks of age). (H) Bdnf mRNA expression in the brain was measured in Cohort 3 (at 32 weeks, endpoint). RM-ANOVA was used for C , two-way ANOVA for D , F and H , and three-way ANOVA (age x sex x genotype) for E and G . Post hoc comparisons were performed using Sidak’s test. Male vs. female comparisons: ## p < 0.01 and ### p < 0.001. WT vs. Negr1 –/– comparisons: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.01. Letters (a–c) denote the significant main effect of age. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. M, males; F, females
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Permeability, Clinical Proteomics
Figure Legend Snippet: Both sexes of Negr1 –/– mice exhibited anxiety, reduced sociability, and impaired spatial learning. (A) Assessment of center zone distance (%) and time (%) relative to total distance and time, measured in the open field test (OFT). (B) Assessment of social interaction ratio in the 3-chnaber social interaction test (3-SIT). (C) Assessment of total number of arm entries (left), the number of spontaneous alternations (middle), and the percentage of spontaneous alternations (right) in the Y-maze. (D) Latency to the hidden platform during the five-day Morris water maze (MWM) training phase (left), percentage of time in the target quadrant on day 6 (middle), and representative swim paths from the 18-week probe trial (right). Data in this figure were obtained from the Cohort 3 and summarize genotype effects across all tested ages (8–30 weeks). These assays showed a significant main effect of genotype but no significant sex x genotype interaction. The data are presented separated by sex to maintain consistency with the study’s focus on sex-specific differences. RM-ANOVA was used to assess group main effects and interactions, with Sidak’s post hoc comparisons. WT vs. Negr1 –/– comparisons: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, and *** p < 0.001. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. M, males; F, females
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Female Negr1 –/– mice exhibited greater depression-like behavior and impaired fear learning, whereas male Negr1 –/– mice exhibited greater anxiety. (A) Assessment of latency time in the passive avoidance test (PAT). (B) Assessment of immobility time in the tail suspension test (TST). (C) Assessment of open arm distance (%) and time (%) relative to total distance and time, measured in the elevated plus maze (EPM). Data in this figure were obtained from Cohort 3, which underwent repeated behavioral assessments (8–30 weeks). Panel A presents longitudinal data to reflect the significant age x sex x genotype interaction observed. Panel B and C present time-collapsed summary data across the tested ages, as only a significant sex x genotype interaction was observed without a significant age interaction. All data are presented separated by sex to highlight the significant sex x genotype interactions. RM-ANOVA was used to assess group main effects and interactions, with Sidak’s post hoc comparisons. WT vs. Negr1 –/– comparisons: ** p < 0.01. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. M, males; F, females
Techniques Used: Suspension
Figure Legend Snippet: Negr1 –/– mice exhibit sex-specific regulation of ER stress. XBP1s mRNA expression in the brain, liver, and colon measured by RT-PCR. mRNA expression was quantified using ImageJ. Two-way ANOVA was used to assess group main effects and interactions, with Sidak’s post hoc comparisons. Male vs. female comparisons: ### p < 0.001. WT vs. Negr1 –/– comparisons: *** p < 0.001. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. M, males; F, females; †: non-specific band
Techniques Used: Expressing, Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction
Figure Legend Snippet: Negr1 –/– mice exhibit sex-specific regulation of apoptosis. Caspase-3 protein expression in the brain, liver, and colon measured by Western blot and quantification of caspase-3 protein levels in tissues. Normalization to loading controls for brain pro-caspase-3 (left) and cleaved/pro-caspase-3 ratios in liver (middle) and colon (right). Protein expression were quantified in ImageJ. Two-way ANOVA was used to assess group main effects and interactions, with Sidak’s post hoc comparisons. Male vs. female comparisons: # p < 0.05 and ## p < 0.01. WT vs. Negr1 –/– comparisons : * p < 0.05 and *** p < 0.001. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. M, males; F, females
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot
Related Articles
Molecular Weight:Article Title: Neuronal growth regulator 1 (NEGR1) promotes synaptic targeting of glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (GAD65) Article Snippet: .. Prolonged exposure revealed a soluble fragment of |

